glossop.com
The community web site for Glossop in the High Peak 
glossopMAIL
Vision Internet Services
bookmark virtual glossop 
email virtual glossop 
search virtual glossop 

home
arts
business
education
forum
g-mail
links
news
search
sports
tourism

Bypass links


The A57 / A628 Mottram - Hollingworth - Tintwistle bypass and the Glossop spur

The preferred route 

Longdendale bypass 2.0?

Geoff Hoon Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon unveiled plans for transport expansion in the north west - including a scaled-down Mottram bypass - in Manchester on Wednesday, May 13, 2009.

High Peak Labour MP Tom Levitt welcomed the announcement. Because it is now a local authority - rather than national - plan, he believes that construction can begin within months.

Indefatigable bypass objector John Hall from Denton had already revealed that the
Mottram – Hollingworth – Tintwistle bypass project was being revised and will now form a bypass of Mottram (only) in conjunction with the Glossop Spur, according to minutes of a meeting of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities on Friday (May 8).

Tom Levitt Amended bypass plan gets the 'Go Ahead'! - Tom Levitt
£1.4bn transport boost - Manchester Evening News
Tram line extension is approved - BBC
£1.3bn transport wish-list -
Manchester Evening News

Meanwhile, the nomottrambypass blog has an exchange of emails (also uncovered by John Hall) between Brenda Taplin, programme officer for the Public Inquiry, and Alex Bywaters, the Highways Agency's project officer, which suggests that no-one quite knows how to end the Public Inquiry.

Planning InspectorateJohn Hall has also asked the Planning Inspectorate under the Freedom of Information Act for the total cost of the Public Inquiry. Their reply says there is no unit cost for inquiries but they expect to charge £56,700 for 90 days of the Inspector's time, plus travel and subsistence. Plus the cost of employing Persona Associates to run the website, which is "likely to have been dealt with" by the Highways Authority. Details here.

Inspector John Watson opened the public inquiry into the Highways Agency's revised proposals for the Longdendale bypass on Tuesday, June 26, 2007 at Stalybridge Civic Hall, Trinity Street, Stalybridge. It was adjourned on Thursday, July 12 and resumed on Tuesday, September 4.

September 2007

The inquiry was dramatically adjourned again on Tuesday, September 11 after the Highways Agency admitted it had got its figures wrong.

The inquiry resumed on Wednesday, September 19
and then adjourned again to allow the Highways Agency to work out its corrections.

November 2007

The inquiry resumed on Tuesday, November 6 but the Highways Agency asked for another adjournment after its own checks revealed mistakes in the revised evidence.

John Hall, who represents the people of Denton and Audenshaw, said he found the Highways Agency's actions 'unbelievable'.

He said: "The incompetence is absolutely staggering and it is an insult to the inquiry. This is going to descend into more farce than it is at the moment."

Mr Hall repeated earlier calls for the hearing to be halted as it was 'no longer credible'.

Mr Watson said: "It is an extraordinary situation, but it is not one we can't cope with."

He said he would adjourn the hearing
again until Tuesday, December 18.

The transcript of the hearing on Tuesday, November 6 is available here.

December 2007

When the inquiry reopened on Tuesday, December 18 it was
adjourned indefinitely "pending the publication of revised evidence by the Highways Agency and Tameside MBC".

The Highways Agency had lodged a new document (HA/73) which says: "The HA intend to revise the original Proofs of Evidence, Environmental Statement and other relevant documents. It is expected that this information will not be available until after Easter 2008. This is because the traffic forecasts upon which much of the evidence is based will not be finalised until early 2008."

The transcript of the hearing on Tuesday, December 18 is available here.

January 2008

Stephen Greenhalgh, the Highways Agency's project leader for the bypass, has moved on and been replaced by Alex Bywaters. A Highways Agency spokesman told the Tameside Reporter (31 January 2008): "As with most organisations, the Highways Agency workers change jobs from time to time and are offered promotion opportunities. The previous project manager has been asked to take on several new schemes within the agency and a replacement has been appointed."

The inquiry has now been adjourned four times to allow the Highways Agency to correct their figures. The bypass, if approved, is expected to cost £183 millions. The project has already cost £13.7 millions.

March 2008

The Highways Agency told Inspector John Watson on Monday, March 10 that their revised evidence will not now be available until October 2008. Details here.

John Hall from Denton, one of the objectors to the bypass, has written to the inspector saying that the public inquiry is being held under "deliberate and knowingly false pretences and the Bypass objectives have been kept hidden by TMBC [Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council] Councillors and those within the administration, plus The Highways Agency, UK Government, and developers and speculators".

The hidden agenda, he says, is that Tameside is co-ordinating proposals for a North European Trade Axis - an "M62 mark 2". Details here.

Secretary of State for Transport, Tom Harris, told Robert Goodwill MP (Scarborough and Whitby) in a written answer on May 6, 2008 that the public inquiry had sat for 15 days between June 26 and December 15, 2007 and that the the scheme had incurred costs of £15 millions.

June 2008

John Watson, the inspector holding the public inquiry, gave The Highways Agency a week (from Wednesday, June 4) to reply to these questions:


"Does the Highways Agency still intend to submit revised evidence to the inquiry? And if so when?"

The inquiry was adjourned indefinitely
in December 2007 "pending the publication of revised evidence by the Highways Agency and Tameside MBC".

The Highways Agency told the inspector in March 2008 that: "It is anticipated that initial revised traffic forecast information for the scheme and the Glossop Spur will be produced by the end of May 2008, and that a firm programme will be available then."

The Highways Agency replied to the Inspector's questions on Wednesday, June 11:

"It is still the Highways Agency’s current intention to submit revised evidence to the Inquiry"

and

"Our current developing programme still indicates that revised evidence will be available in October 2008.

Natural England wrote to Chris Banks, the inquiry programme officer, on Monday, June 16 asking:

"When will the 'firm programme' envisaged as being available by the end of May 2008, now be available?"

July 2008

The cost of the proposed Longdendale bypass could reach £315 million, according to a Highways Agency document revealed by the nomottrambypass blog on July 17, 2008.

This is an increase of 71% on the figure in the Nichols Report of 2007 and 283% on the original 2003 estimate of £90 million.

The blog recently revealed the cost of the Glossop spur road had risen by 54% from £7.18 million in 2000 to £11.07 million.

August 2008

The Highways Agency will not now be able to submit its revised Environmental Statement about the proposed Longdendale bypass to the public inquiry until May 2009, according to the nomottrambypass blog.

HA's 'update on progress' August 2008 is here. It says that a "consultation strategy is being developed and will be issued as an HA document in September 2008". And "it is planned to submit the revised Environmental Statement, the Statement of Case, Economic Appraisal Report and Proofs of Evidence to the Inquiry in May 2009".

[The Highways Agency is spending £3.8 million to correct a £1.5 million scheme on the M56 at Bowdon after their traffic modelling programme "got it wrong", according to the Manchester Evening News.]

September 2008

The Highways Agency's latest document says that a series of exhibitions will be held in May/June 2009 to explain its revised evidence to the adjourned Public Inquiry, which could possibly resume in the autumn of 2009.

November 2008

Paul Clark (Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for Transport) told Robert Goodwill, Conservative MP for Scarborough and Whitby, that the scheme has now incurred costs of £16,000,000. (Hansard, 13 November 2008)

Geoff HoonThe new Transport Secretary, Geoff Hoon (right), met local MPs Tom Levitt and James Purnell with Tameside Council Leader Roy Oldham last week (November 2008), according to High Peak Labour MP Tom Levitt.

The meeting was called to try to get the road plans for the A628 / A57 (the Longdendale bypass and Glossop spur) back on track after the public enquiry ran into "technical problems".

Tom Levitt says: "A number of ways forward were discussed and some were ruled out. For example, local politicians and the Highways Agency agreed that there was no credible alternative route for the road." Tom said that Glossop's economic development relied heavily on the bypass and the associated Glossop Spur being built together.

Geoff Hoon
knows the area - he was the Euro-MEP until 1994. He said that officials would explore options to bring the plans back on course quickly.

December 2008

On December 18, 2008, exactly a year after the adjournment of the public inquiry, Inspector John Watson issued document X20, Preparation for the Resumption of the Inquiry.

Transport campaigners are demanding an explanation from Geoff Hoon, the Secretary of State for Transport, about his role as the decision-maker for the Longdendale bypass, according to the Buxton Advertiser.

Friends of the Peak District
and the Campaign for National Parks have asked him to explain reports about a recent meeting he held with pro-bypass lobbyists.

After the meeting, High Peak Labour MP Tom Levitt was quoted in the local press saying that "local politicians and the Highways Agency agreed that there was no credible alternative route for the road." He said that it was also accepted that the bypass and the additional Glossop spur road were now "welded together."

The nomottrambypass blog has published notes of the 'official' version of the meeting - obtained by bypass objector John Hall - in which the Secretary of State said he was "awaiting formal advice from the relevant regional authorities before making a decision". Which raises the question of what the adjourned public inquiry is for?

February 2009

On February 20, 2009, the regional leaders' forum, 4NW, decided to defer the start on the bypass until 2015/2016. Details here.

March 2009

The Highways Agency announced on Tuesday, March 24, 2009, that it was withdrawing from the Public Inquiry. Details here.

On Friday, March 27, Manchester City Council chief executive Sir Howard Bernstein put a shorter, cheaper alternative to the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities. They will decide next month whether to ask the Government to reinstate the project.

On March 31 the Inspector issued document X21, asking the Highways Agency and Tameside Borough to let him know within 15 days if they intended to withdraw the draft Orders for the scheme, so that he could close the Inquiry.

On April 15 Tameside added their response, saying they expected to withdraw the Orders by the end of April.

May 2009

The Longdendale bypass scheme has cost £1,176,000 in the six months since November 13, 2008, according to Paul Clark, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Department for Transport in a reply to a written question from Robert Goodwill, Conservative MP for Scarborough and Whitby, prompted by bypass objector John Hall from Denton. (Hansard, Tuesday, May 5, 2009). The cost up to November 13, 2008 was £16 million.


The public inquiry website:

http://www.persona.uk.com/mottram/


Bypass plan back on the road - Manchester Evening News - 30 March 09
Mottram bypass - (MEN video)
Fury after bypass inquiry collapses - Manchester Evening News - 25 March 09
Bypass inquiry to be scrapped - Manchester Evening News - 24 March 09
Bypass blocked (video)
Six year delay for bypass - Glossop Advertiser - 4 March 09
Bypass plans on hold for 7 years - Manchester Evening News - 28 February 09
Rules bypassed on road inquiry? - Buxton Advertiser - 24 December 08
Unbuilt bypass costs £16 million - Manchester Evening News 
- 19 November 08
Bypass plans shoot up by another £1 million - Glossop Advertiser - 19 November 08
Don't Swallow up our wood - Glossop Advertiser - 5 November 08
Bypass inquiry on road to record - Manchester Evening News - 29 August 08
Bypass cost may treble - Manchester Evening News - 29 July 08
Delay hits bypass inquiry, again - Manchester Evening News - 20 June 08
Bypass scheme has incurred costs of £15millions - Hansard - 8 May 08
Views from both sides of the road - Glossop Advertiser - 27 February 08
£800,000 on the road to nowhere - Manchester Evening News - 19 February 08

Bypass delays 'costing business' - Manchester Evening News - 22 January 08

Bypass inquiry costs of £13.7m - Glossop Advertiser - 16 January 08
Tunnel demo 'victory' - Glossop Advertiser - 16 January 08
Fight stepped up save rail tunnel - Glossop Advertiser - 9 January 08
Campaign with tunnel vision - Glossop Advertiser - 2 January 08
More hold-ups -
Glossop Chronicle 20 December 07
Bypass inquiry now off until Easter 2008 - Glossop Advertiser 19 December 07
Bypass inquiry hits another jam - Manchester Evening News - 17 December 07
Rising costs of bypass protest - Glossop Advertiser - 5 December 07
Bypass hearing delayed, again - Manchester Evening News - 7 November 07
Bypass inquiry delayed again - Glossop Advertiser - 7 November 07
Bypass probe put on hold again - Manchester Evening News - 20 September 07
Cyclists put spoke in whell of bypass - Glossop Advertiser - 19 September 07
Bypass cable shock - Glossop Advertiser - 19 September 07
Cyclists protest against bypass plan - Manchester Evening News - 18 September 07
Inquiry into bypass halted - Manchester Evening News - 12 September 07
Peak bypass battle - Manchester Evening News - 6 September 07
'Traffic should go round park' - Glossop Advertiser - 5 September 07
Battle of Peak bypass begins - Manchester Evening News - 5 September 07
'Underground alternative' to bypass - Manchester Evening News - 31 August 07
Bypass protest gathers speed - Glossop Chronicle - 31 August 07
Bypass parks threat - Glossop Advertiser - 29 August 07
Bypass alternatives: your say - Glossop Advertiser - 29 August 07
Bypass bike demo support is critical - Glossop Advertiser - 15 August 07
Bypass is a 'crime' -
Glossop Advertiser - 18 July 07
Bypass sparks inquiry battle - Glossop Advertiser - 11 July 07
'Bypass is only option' - Glossop Advertiser - 5 July 07
Bypass inquiry up and running - Glossop Chronicle,  5 July 07
Channel M video report, including Glossop taxi owner Chris Woodward
Agency slammed at bypass inquiry - Manchester Evening News, 27 June 07
Call for better access to plans - Glossop Advertiser - 2 May 07
Bypass showdown - Glossop Advertiser - 25 April 07
Cost of bypass set to double to £184 million - Glossop Advertiser - 28 March 07

The objectors' alternatives can be downloaded here (PDF, 2.5 Mb)

The Longdendale bypass has a page on Wikipedia.



The Highways Agency appointed Mowlem PLC under the Highways Agency’s Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) initiative, to take the scheme forward. This allows for detailed planning work to be carried out while the scheme is taken through the statutory procedures.

On 31st January 2006 The Secretary of State published the proposals in the form of Draft Orders. The published Orders included proposals to:

  • Bypass sections of the A57 and A628 passing through the villages of Mottram, Hollingworth and Tintwistle within the Metropolitan Borough of Tameside and the County of Derbyshire. The bypassed sections are between the M67 eastern Terminal Roundabout at Hattersley and Townhead Farm on the east side of Tintwistle over a distance of approximately 5 kilometres [Draft Line Order];
  • Provide route restraint measures on the bypass and at Flouch;
  • Provide for a length of the A57 and the A628 that is to be superseded by the bypass, to cease to be a trunk road [Draft Detrunking Order];
  • Provide for the stopping up of existing highways and private means of access, to improve and alter existing highways and to construct new highways and accesses that may be necessary for the construction of the new bypass and the route restraint measures at Flouch [Draft Side Roads Orders];
  • Compulsorily purchase land and rights required for the construction of the scheme including essential mitigation works [Draft Compulsory Purchase Order].

The public and other interested organisations were allowed a period of 13 weeks until 5th May 2006 to express their support, comment on, or object to the proposals. A large number of people have written in with their views and each person or organisation expressing a written view will receive a full response to the points that they have raised.
 
The Government has, for the first time, given regions a say in decision-making about transport schemes that affect them at regional and local levels. The Mottram to Tintwistle Bypass is one of those schemes that is considered at a regional level. The North West Regional Assembly presented advice to Ministers in January 2006 and provided a revised sequencing of priority schemes in June 2006.

On 6th July 2006 The Secretary of State for Transport responded to this advice and confirmed that funding provision should be made for the A628 Mottram -Hollingworth-Tintwistle bypass beyond 2010/11. Accordingly, the Highways Agency will continue to progress the scheme through the statutory procedures so that it is ready to start works as soon as funding is available within the Regional Funding Allocation.

The change to the proposed timing of construction and funding for the project required a review of the published Environmental Statement and its re publication together with the associated draft Orders.

Revised traffic modelling was undertaken to represent the new opening (2015) year for the scheme and the incorporation of additional route restraint measures. The Secretary of State therefore published the revised draft Orders and Environmental Statement on 9th February 2007.

The publication of the revised draft Orders allowed interested parties to examine the revised proposals and to offer comments in the form of support, objections or other representations. The period for these comments ended on 30 March 2007. Further letters of objection and support were received during the Objection period.

Following the end of the Objection period the Highways Agency issued a letter to all parties who have provided comments on the original and republished proposals. This confirmed the intention to hold a Public Inquiry commencing on 26 June 2007.

The letter confirmed the appointment of Mr Chris Banks of Persona Associates as Programme Officer for the Inquiry. His role is to provide the interface between the Inspector and those who participate in the Inquiry, to arrange the Inquiry programme and to maintain the Inquiry library.

On 27 April 2007 the Highways Agency published its Statement of Case. This is a written statement which contains full particulars of the case which the Highways Agency proposes to put forward at the Public Inquiry. In addition to the Statement of Case, the Highways Agency provided details of the deposit points where a copy of every document or relevant part of any document which is referred to or put in evidence may be inspected free of charge. These deposit locations are as follows:

  • Stalybridge Civic Hall Trinity Street, Stalybridge, Cheshire SK15 2BN
  • Stocksbridge Library, Manchester Road, Stocksbridge, Sheffield S36 1DH

A Pre Inquiry Meeting was held on 1 May 2007 at Stalybridge Civic Hall. Its purpose was to help all involved prepare for the Inquiry. A copy of the notes produced following this meeting can be obtained by contacting Chris Banks, the programme officer on 01403 217799. Chris can also be contacted for details of the website that has been sent up for the Public Inquiry.
 
The Public Inquiry commenced at 10 am on 26 June at Stalybridge Civic Hall, Trinity Street, Stalybridge, Cheshire. SK15 2BN. Evidence was presented by the Highways Agency for the Bypass and by Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council for the Glossop Spur Road.

Evidence was heard in support of the Scheme from various parties and some objectors have also presented their case. The Inquiry adjourned on 12 July 2007 for the summer holidays. Further objections to the Scheme will be heard when the Inquiry re-opens.
 
Several alternatives to the Highways Agency’s Published scheme have been suggested, and as such, consideration is being given to each of them. Details of these alternatives can be found in the booklet headed “A57/A628 Mottram Tintwistle Bypass and A628/A616 Route Restraint Measures – Objectors’ Alternative Proposals to the Draft Orders Published in February 2007”.

This booklet is found in the publications page of this scheme website. Anyone wishing to comment on the Objectors Alternative proposals should do so as soon as possible (and by 13 September at the latest) by writing to:

A57/A628 Mottram Tintwistle Team,
Highways Agency,
Stalybridge Civic Hall,
Trinity Street,
Stalybridge
SK15 2BN  

The Highways Agency DOES NOT support these alternative proposals.
All comments received will be passed to the Inspector for his consideration.
The Inquiry will re convene on Tuesday 4 September at 10am

Following the Inquiry the Inspector will produce a report making a recommendation based on the evidence presented by the Highways Agency, the objectors, the supporters and anybody who has made a representation during the Inquiry

The decision whether to proceed with the scheme will be taken after the Secretary of State for Transport has considered the Inspector’s Report.



A contract to build the Mottram-Hollingworth-Tintwistle bypass has been awarded to Mowlem PLC (later bought by Carillion PLC).

Douglas Alexander In June 2006 the Northwest Regional Assembly revised priorities for transport schemes and on 6 July 2006 the Secretary of State for Transport, Douglas Alexander (right), confirmed that funding provision for the bypass should be made beyond 2010/11.

On Friday, February 9, 2007 the Secretary of State published revised draft legal orders and environmental statement to reflect revised traffic modelling for the new opening (2015) for the scheme.
 


Public inquiry

Stephen Ladyman The public inquiry into proposals for the bypass will take place early in 2007, Transport Minister Dr Stephen Ladyman (right) announced on Thursday, June 1, 2006.

The public inquiry into the revised proposals started on Tuesday, June 26 at 10.00am at Stalybridge Civic Hall, Trinity Street, Stalybridge.

The public inquiry website
http://www.persona.uk.com/mottram/



Bypass links

Campaign against the Mottram and Tintwistle bypass
http://www.stopmottrambypass.org/

Campaign group for Mottram/Tintwistle bypass
http://www.longdendalebypass.co.uk/

GlossopSpur.com
http://www.glossopspur.com/

The Highways Agency
http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/5515.aspx


Mottram residents against the pypass

http://www.savemottram.org.uk/

Peak District National Park
http://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/index/news/news-display-page.htm?id=11990

Road Alert Glossop
http://www.myspace.com/roadalert

Roadblock
http://www.roadblock.org.uk/exhibtion/mottram.htm

Save Swallows Wood
http://www.saveswallowswood.org.uk/

Stop Mottram Bypass
http://www.stopmottrambypass.org/

Stop the A57/A628 Bypass
http://www.nomottrambypass.blogspot.com/

Tom Levitt, Labour MP for the High Peak
http://www.tomlevitt.labour.co.uk/ViewPage.cfm?Page=14547

Woodhead Against Increased Traffic
http://www.wait-campaign.co.uk/




Phone & fax: 01457 856492 | Email: mail@glossop.com

Site hosted by Vision Internet Services